Posts Tagged ‘WSRP’

Portal Federation with WebLogic Portal WRSP Part 1: The Basics

Friday, September 3rd, 2010
No Gravatar

Originally published at developer.com

WSRP stands for Web Services for Remote Portlets, a handy specification from the folks at OASIS that provides a standard for portal applications to share portlets between portals. Put another way, WSRP is the ability to produce an interface to useful functionality which can be consumed throughout your enterprise with little or no changes to existing code. Sound familiar?

Almost all of the latest versions of commercial and open source portal products support WSRP, though your mileage may vary based on the vendor.  The basic mechanism is the same as any old web service. The producer provides a WSDL that instructs the consumer on how to generate a SOAP request. The difference between web services and WSRP is that with a web service the developers of the consumer application next need to figure out how they will use the SOAP response where the WSRP consumer receives a response at the presentation level and all the consumer needs to do is decide where they will display it.  The portal frameworks abstract the heavy lifting and all that is required of developers is to configure the producer and consumer to achieve basic WSRP integration. In theory, this simplicity provides all an enterprise needs to reuse portlets across the enterprise “instamagiclly”. In practice, business requirements rarely let us get off the hook so easy.  In fact, once an enterprise begins to use WSRP, the requirements tend to get more and more complicated, which is why the WebLogic Portal (WLP) has evolved to provide more and more WSRP functionality with increasing ease of development.

When WSRP Makes Sense

WSRP is a technology that provides three benefits. One is reuse; another is performance, (though oftentimes using WSRP will provide only one these two benefits); and the third is the ability to release portlets asynchronously.

WSRP is not the only approach to achieving portlet reuse. Portlets can also be bundled into a WAR file and used as a shared library, or simply copied from one application to another.  Where reuse is the goal, WSRP is the solution of choice when the portlet is used in more than one portal.

Sometimes portlets are resource intensive. If a portal page contains a collection of portlets where system or network resources impact the usability of the portal, WSRP can provide a strategy where the processing is divided across servers to improve performance.

Portals provide the ability to aggregate access to applications. In many enterprises, these applications are owned and maintained by disparate groups where the coordination of release schedules can be difficult (if not impossible). Here, WSRP provides the advantage of allowing a portlet or group of portlets to be released independently of the main portal application.

The Best Way to Consume a Remote Portlet

In the WebLogic Portal, portlets are WSRP enabled by default since version 9.2, as shown below:

In fact, the notation in the .portlet file is only required if you are not offering your portlet as remote, as show by these two snippets:

<netuix:portlet definitionLabel=”simpleProducerA_1″ title=”Simple Producer A”>

<netuix:portlet definitionLabel=”nonRemoteExample_1″ offerRemote=”false” title=”Locals Only”>

In a WSRP implementation, the remote portal is the producer and the portal displaying the remote portlet is the consumer. The consumer gains access to the producer by registering the producer as a remote producer by accessing the producers WSDL. The WSDL is generated automatically by WLP and available as an address from the producers web application in the format of [server_address]/[web_application]/producer?wsdl. The example portal applications referenced in this article are named wsrpConsumer and wsrpProducer, with the portal web applications being named wsrpConsumerWEB and wsrpProducerWEB, which would make the producer’s WSDL address http://localhost:7001/wsrpProducerWEB/producer?wsdl. This WSDL simply defines key details about interacting with the producer, such as security:

<wssp:SecurityToken TokenType=”http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-2004-01-saml-token-profile-1.0#SAMLAssertionID”>

And where to find various services, such as registration:

<s0:port binding=”s3:WSRP_v1_Registration_Binding_SOAP” name=”WSRPRegistrationService”>

<s4:address location=”https://localhost:7002/wsrpProducerWEB/producer/wsrp-1.0/registration” />

</s0:port>

While the most basic of WSRP producers require 60+ lines of XML to define the WSDL, even the most complicated WLP applications will generate a WSDL for you. The only hand editing you may need to do is with simpler files such as wsrp-producer-config.xml and wsrp-producer-registry.xml.

Remote portlets are consumed in the producer with a proxy portlet, and WLP provides two ways to create a proxy portlet. One method is through the WebLogic Workshop IDE at design time. Defining a proxy portlet at design time requires providing an address to the producer in a .portlet file, which cannot be changed at runtime. Due to this drawback, this approach is not recommended in this article. If you want to see how it works in detail, you can follow the tutorial included in the WLP documentation.

The other method to define a proxy portlet is through the WLP Portal Administration Tool (PAT). To define proxy portlets in the PAT, you must first create a streaming portal. Streaming portals are database-driven rather than file-based (where users access the portal through a .portal file defined in Workshop). There are many considerations outside of WSRP in choosing between a file-based versus a streaming portal and are beyond the scope of this article.

To quickly illustrate the steps of creating a streaming portal and consuming a WSRP portlet we will use the naming conventions from our example applications as well as the existing assets in the example. For simplicity we will have both portal applications deployed to the same domain. With this in mind, here is the process to create a streaming portal and consuming a simple remote portlet:

With portal server running, navigate to http://localhost:7001/wsrpConsumerAdmin for your consumer portal’s administration console (or, with the Portal perspective open in Workshop, select Run\Open Portal Administration Console) and log in with the admin credentials. From the Portal Management page, create a streaming portal and a desktop based on the .portal file you created in Workshop. In the screen shot below, we’ve created a portal named “wsrp” with desktop named “default”.

Next, add your producer portal to your library by expanding Library and Remote Producers, then click on the Add Producer button. In the wizard, enter

http://localhost:7001/wsrpProducerWEB/producer?wsdl and click Search. Click on the Remote Producer in the search results, then follow the self-explanatory prompts to complete registration.

With your remote producer registered, click on the producers’ name, then Selected Portlets to access the Add Portlets button. The Add Portlets button will start a straight-forward wizard to add your remote portlets.

Finally, add the Hello Producer to your Consumer Desktop using the intuitive PAT, which will display as follows once completed:

In WLP 9.2, the process of placing your remote portlets must be repeated manually for each environment (typically, with varying names and number of environments, Test, Staging, and Production). Beginning in WLP 10.0, WSRP portlets can be included in propagation as other portal configurations are in earlier versions of WSRP (see Propagating Weblogic 8.x Portals for an introduction to portal propagation).

If you followed the naming examples in this article you can browse to http://localhost:7001/wsrpConsumerWEB/appmanager/wsrp/default to see the results.

Congratulations, you have achieved portal federation with WSRP!

  • Share/Bookmark

WSRP over HTTPS in WLP

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009
No Gravatar

Ever run across a problem that sounds real familiar, but you don’t remember all the details of the solution? Recently someone was telling me an issue they were having with WSRP where the WSDL when accessed over the HTTPS port still showed the HTTP end point.  That is when I experience De Ja Vue (I’v seen this before).

When using HTTPS with WSRP in WLP you must edit the wsrp-producer-config.xml in the producer application:

<!– This element describes the capabilities of this producer. Set the secure attribute to “true” if you require this producer offer any port over SSL. –>
<service-config>
<registration required=”true” secure=”true“/>
<service-description secure=”true“/>
<!– Set accepts-mime to true to more efficiently process uploaded files when the consumer is a WebLogic Portal. –>
<markup secure=”false” rewrite-urls=”true” transport=”string” accepts-mime=”false”/>
<portlet-management required=”true” secure=”true“/>
</service-config>

The bold is where the default value has been changed to true. My conclusion from this is that with WLP your WSRP portlets are either available over HTTP or HTTPS, but not both. I haven’t tested this theroy, however, as I have not yet worked on a WSRP project that was not over HTTPS.

  • Share/Bookmark

WLP Sessions and Porlets in Shared Libraries

Thursday, June 11th, 2009
No Gravatar

Awhile back, I ran into an issue where session data was being lost between requests in a WebLogic Portal project. As it only occurred in a clustered environment, it was obvious that the value was not being persisted, even though persistence was set properly with

<wls:session-descriptor>
<wls:persistent-store-type>replicated_if_clustered</wls:persistent-store-type>
</wls:session-descriptor>

After much frustration, someone on the team ran across an additional setting for the session-descriptor node: sharing-enabled. In the case where a portlet is from a shared library, the persistence does not work unless sharing-enabled is set to true.

<wls:session-descriptor>
<wls:persistent-store-type>replicated_if_clustered</wls:persistent-store-type>
<wls:sharing-enabled>true</wls:sharing-enabled>
</wls:session-descriptor>

In hindsight, this behavior makes some sense, in that most portlets that are distributed as shared libraries by vendors do not require session values. However, in the case where a shared library is created by an application team to reuse portlets across portals where WSRP is not practical, the need to share sessions may arise, and now you know how to fix it.

For other deployment descriptor options, see http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12840_01/wls/docs103/webapp/weblogic_xml.html

  • Share/Bookmark

Useful Google API Article Series

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009
No Gravatar

Developer.com has a series on Google integration with PHP at http://www.developer.com/services/article.php/3680076.

I suppose this would be a good time to grouse that they never gave my two series (WSRP and POI) a page of their own :)

Between the York District Boy Scouts  Spring Wateree Campout and a cold, I have not been posting much lately, so this a is re-tread from Frequently Unasked Questions.

  • Share/Bookmark